Controlled falling

Broken escalator, controlled falling, take the step;

Free again, down the rabbit hole, enter the keyhole;

Unlock the butterfly, inside.

Fixed escalator, uncontrollable falling, split mind;

Slavery starts, up into the light, exit the parachute;

Lock the caterpillar, outside.

Controlled escalator, broken falling, take the parachute;

Split butterfly, down the light, mind the caterpillar;

Fly the lock into butter, side out, side in.

Out, in, up, on. Side lock. Control the free.

Enslave the split. Light the down. Up the keyhole.

Free, at last. Falling controlled.

Posted in Poetry | 2 Comments

Cars, Cheap Motels, and traveling the great brown land of OZ.

From the movie “Cars”

Sally: Forty years ago, that interstate down there didn’t exist.

Lightning McQueen: Really?

Sally: Yeah. Back then, cars came across the country a whole different way.

Lightning McQueen: How do you mean?

Sally: Well, the road didn’t cut through the land like that interstate. It moved with the land, it rose, it fell, it curved. Cars didn’t drive on it to make great time. They drove on it to have a great time.

- “CARS”  (2006 PIXAR movie)

I was due to be born on Christmas Eve, 1979. I arrived two weeks later on January 7, 1980 at Box Hill Hospital. And through a stroke of luck, our family was featured in the local paper as part of the “New Arrivals” section. When it came time to go home for the first time, I was taken in a brand new Holden motorcar.

It was December 1979, with the help of a family loan, my parents bought their first, and last, new car. It was a yellow Holden Gemini, and had just won Car of the Year. The yellow was for increased visibility and safety for the “baby on board”. In my hometown, that car became very well known because of its unique colour. In fact, people we hadn’t met would say, “Oh! You’re the person that drives that yellow car!” It was kind of embarrassing.

By the time I was seven, I had moved house five times, and interstate twice. The manufacturing genius of 1979 was my only “stability”. The only vaguely interesting thing about moving were the great variety of cheap motels we used to stay in. These one-room, one-bathroom wonders always had kind of intriguing quality about them. Would the room smell as much as last time? Would the bed sag in the middle, or be rock-hard? What kind of vomit would they serve as food? Mostly we would end up having “fish and chips”, but they were the really swish places! During all this thirty-dollor-a-night fun, sleeping was often not a part of the itinerary, what with Dad snoring, and the highway only meters away. Still this was better then the time Dad decided it would be cheaper to stop and sleep in the car.

Another detour of fun and relief (mainly relief) was the gas/petrol station. These oasis’s in the endless sea of brown dirt provided three essentials; a toilet (albeit broken and unflushed), gas/petrol for the road ahead, and the chance to stretch. These places would try and cash in on this and would turn themselves into mini-tourist attractions, of the “Big THING” variety, such as the Big Banana, the Big Pineapple, the Big Merino (sheep), the Big Prawn, and anything else you could think of. A great chance to take a picture and eat a not inexpensive meal of “fat drowned in gravy”.

In between the cheap motels and the “dog on the tucker [lunch] box” type attractions was the actual traveling. Which was often accompanied by my old friend boredom. Travel games and counting types of cars, cows, trees, rolls of hay and endless bottles of beer did not help. But it wasn’t always so boring. They was the time the car broke down about half an hour out of the town of Hay. We were forced to stay in the local pub, which was a big eye-opener for my little Minister’s Son eyes. Unfortunately I passed on the opportunity of land ownership, (six dollars an acre, it might even be worth eight by now!). Then there was the time a large truck sent a small stone in our direction, smashing the front windscreen. That was a very cold and windy journey.

As you may not know, I am only two generations off the farm, and I still have relative who are actual farmers. So, considering relatives are generally the cheapest accommodation of all, we tried to stay with as many of them, as often as possible. And my relatives are everywhere. One of these free bed and breakfast’s existed just outside of Lockhart, a very small town, an hour away from Wagga Wagga – Australia’s largest inland “city”. On this farm were two houses built for three generations of Smith’s, and a lot of sheep. In one house was my Great Aunt Lil, not the nicest person in the world, and her crazy husband, and in the other house was my cousin Natasha. Great Aunt Lil liked to play favorites, Natasha would receive a grand meal of boiled potatoes, while the rest of us would starve. After all, there were “only enough potatoes for Natasha”.

The hot dust and sheep droppings haven’t infected me with a love of the country life, it has given me an understanding of life and death that many others don’t have. Natasha named a lamb after me once. Here is the story of his life; his balls were cut off so that he wouldn’t develop into a Ram, then promptly became the evening meal of Lamb Chops and Roast. I found it quite shocking at the time, perhaps this is the reason I tried vegetarianism for a while. Although, I have to say that lambs are far from soft and cuddly creatures, they are extremely strong (try feeding one milk) and boney little things.

Well, perhaps it wasn’t so dull after all. And in this age of air-travel, increasingly unique. Perhaps in this fast food age, we are missing out on the little quirks of life, the little detours that make nice stories. The in-flight movie doesn’t really hold up against all this.

Posted in travel | Tagged , | Leave a comment

San Fransokyo

This new movie looks amazing! It seems that the guys at Pixar have really shown there love of all things Ghibli and gone all out with this. For the new movie, “Big Hero 6″.

One concern is that this teaser builds up so much expectations, can the movie possibly live up to it? I still remember Dinosaur  The teaser for that looked amazing, but I was so disappointed with the film. Your thoughts?

Link | Posted on by | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Nightly New Year

Auld Lang Syne signals,

a shop closing in Japan,

“get out, get out” – it seems to ring in my ears -

but I sit, sipping my drink,

ignorant to it’s cries,

And celebrate the nightly new year.

Cheers, to you. Japan.

And your mysterious ways.Image

Posted in Poetry, travel | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Gay: the new service industry?

or: How I stopped worrying and learned to love Bob Brown.

This isn’t meant to be read by anyone, but if you want to read it, please be my guest. In fact, do you need a pedicure? Perhaps a new hair-do? A new look? A new boyfriend? Someone to listen to your endless petty dramas while I don’t have any life of my own? Someone to invite to parties so you can look more fashionable? Someone whose opinion is only sought when Britney, Paris, or the latest case of the current outbreak of the celebrity disease? Something witty to go with your wine and after dinner mints?

Not so long ago I was watching an interview RuPaul was giving at the launch of his latest film “Starrbooty”, a rebellious anti-PC independent movie. And what he said really struck a nerve with me – that Gays are the new “

Bob Brown in his prime

servants”. If you look at anything from “Queer Eye for the Straight Guy” to the latest Romantic Comedy with the gay best friend, to all those gay Hollywood “Reporters” for the morning news, and the gay fashion designers putting together their lists of “what’s hot” at the Oscars. Gays are only “acceptable” in a straight world if we are seen to be “helping” straights. I might go further be saying that gays are only given a voice on the most trivial matters like fashion and celebrity.

The two men I have seen actually given a voice? Bob Brown, leader of the Australian Greens, and a man whose name I forgot, the former Deputy Premier and Minister for Health and Aboriginal Affairs in NSW during the time of Bob Carr’s leadership. Two great politicians who rose to the top of their game. While I don’t necessarily agree with everything that they say, at least they can say it. They aren’t judged by their looks like former rugby league star Ian Roberts, or have to parade their boyfriends and personal lives for everyone to see. Their opinions are heard. The Deputy Premier fought his way though the blue-collar world of the Australian Labour Party, whereas Bob Brown has made his own political party. I have never really agreed with the Greens, I think that saving the environment is great, but I think that the Greens are just a protest party. Getting work done in Parliament means making deals, compromise and guiding the public rather then pushing them. However, I’m never going to judge his right to express his views. They are his. The one thing you can say about Bob Brown is that there are no surprises. You know exactly what he is going to say about an issue before he says it.

Beyond Australia, you have the amazing Gore Vidal, author and commentator of American Culture and History. As interesting and relevant as I find him, I still feel that he fits into that witty social commentator role left by Oscar Wilde. Hostesses like nothing better then a bit of Truman Capote to add a spicy bit of controversy to make her dinner parties the greatest hits of the season. But wit so often has build in obsolescence, it is very rare that something topical today, will have any meaning ten, fifty or a hundred years from now. And because this wit becomes yesterday’s news so quickly, so too does the person who says it. And thus all gays are seen to have no longevity. Look at “The Block” and it’s much less successful imitator “The Hot House”, the token gay couple on both programs were constantly referred to as ‘the boys’ despite being well over forty. Because being gay is such a childish thing, a faze, a whim, something that one decides to do to rebel against society before ‘settling down’ for a real marriage to a woman. No, two men couldn’t possibly have real feelings for each other. It’s just sex, or puppy love doomed to failure. No, these ‘boys’ could never be mature enough to raise children, so let’s not let them have a real marriage.

Of course, in parts of the world two men can get married. We even have Elton John as our own fearless leader, with his younger husband. While I don’t agree with his lifestyle or lack of taste, at least its something. And Elton, along with Gore Vidal, Ian McKellen – the actor who plays Magneto in the X-Men movies, Dominic Dunne, David Geffen, and Quentin Crisp, at least provide a role model of life after forty for the average gay man. So long as you are rich and famous, and provide a service to the straight community in the form of music, movies, and witty commentary.

Life, of course isn’t so bad. After all we do have “Philadelphia”, “Brokeback Mountain”, and “Angels in America” showing gays in loving relationships albeit with Hollywood’s usual “Love Story” treatment of one of the main characters dieing at the end. And although these stories are terribly dated, they at least represent a positive change from the suicidal, mentally disturbed, serial-killing sluts that were the gay characters from “Cruising” in the 1970′s to “Basic Instinct” of the 1990′s and beyond. The truth is that we can’t look to the heterosexual community to define us. We define ourselves right? So who exactly are we?

Are we the fifteen-year old sneaking into a club with his best friend? The eighteen-year old getting his free pass to a lifetime of sex, drugs and robotic soulless dance music? Or the 40 – 60 year olds trying to get their taste of young flesh, the younger the better? Or are we the invisible 30 year-olds playing the game on the internet? Are we the man playing dress-ups in drag? Are we the “straight” husbands or men with steady boyfriends looking for a bit of side action? Are we the man who is a serial multiple dater, not remembering exactly what he did with whom? Or are we the man writing obscene messages on the toilet walls? Are we the man whose not quite sure he has AIDS, but is bare-backing everything that moves anyway? Or are we the man who knows he has AIDS and is doing the same thing? Or are we the man who dreams of a steady relationship with children and a dog? Or are we all these things? Or none of these things?

When will the gay community get serious? Because when you start treating yourself as something more then just a trivial, helpful, witty slut obsessed with celebrity, the world around you starts doing the same thing. Where are the scandalous stories about Bob Brown? You don’t hear them because he is serious. He takes pride in himself, and his private life is his own. When the only images of masculine gay men in the media are found in hard-core porn you know that something has gone wrong. So where are the role models? Speaker of the house, I nominate the honorable Bob Brown.

Posted in Industry Musings | Leave a comment

It was beauty that killed the beast: King Kong (2006) Review

King Kong in the climatic scene

Recently on a hot friday night, packing and sorting my life’s work in Australia, looking for something to watch in the background, I found the latest version of King Kong. Having not heard anything great about it, I thought it would be the perfect backdrop to a hot night’s work. And it was. It was actually much better then I thought it would be.

Having never seen it before I was quite surprised to recognise the entire story. All the most famous elements of the original were there, from the cannibals, to the fight with the dinosaur, to the Broadway show, to the most famous of all, the fight at the top of the Empire State Building in New York. The biggest difference being that, at over three and a half hours, it was much longer then the original. Peter Jackson has been very reverential with the story, and has basically treated the new version as a chance to update the CGI graphics (the original used stop-motion puppetry, revolutionary for the time), and give the old story the usual ever so slight feminist update (Ann Darrow runs up to the top of the Empire State to be with Kong, whereas in the original she was taken up by Kong), but without damaging the love story between Ann and Kong.

However I think, aside from a good editor, an essential element was missing from the update. A couple of years ago I read an essay about King Kong in the wonderful book “Cult Movies” by Danny Peary. In it he talks through the films historical importance (the original was released in 1939, around the time of the great depression and before the outbreak of WWII). Around this time, many films were delving into newly discovered ideas in psychology coming from Freud and Carl Jung. Jung’s idea of the “shadow self” is very much a part of the movie. While the movie could easily be read as a metaphor for the sentiment at the time regarding Black Men (just see “To kill a mocking bird” to look at attitudes regarding black men and blonde women), it could just as easily be looked at from a psychological standpoint. With the placid, downtrodden man (perhaps weak from the depression) and his suppressed desire for Ann Darow, the beautiful blonde actress. This suppressed desire takes the shape of the wild untamed (though later tamed by love) Gorilla. I think any man (or woman perhaps) could understand this feeling, there certainly was a man in Japan that brought out the gorilla in me. And I understand how Kong would go on a near suicidal mission, just to search for the woman he loves, and then when he finds her, to defend her on the Empire state building. Such a powerful iconic image, that hasn’t descended into cliche, like when the gust of air blows Marilyn Monroe’s pure white dress sky high.

I was surprised how much the story reminded me of Bruce Banner/Incredible Hulk. Whereas Kong represents the shadowy sexual beast, the Hulk represents that inner demon of pure white hot anger. There isn’t really much to the Hulk, just pure rage that lives inside of the mild-mannered Bruce Banner. I think perhaps the reason why the Hulk movie didn’t work was because there just isn’t much to the story. Batman is angry, but he is also interesting.

So despite it being too long, it was perfect for a hot Saturday night with nothing to do. And to quote Matt, if it has entertained you for two hours, it’s a good movie. I just think it could of been a more interesting one.

Posted in Film Reviews | Leave a comment

Book Review: Inventing a Nation by Gore Vidal

“Inventing a Nation” – International Cover

In my new-found desire to embrace my brain with both arms, I wandered into the bookshop with a hole burning in my pocket. The book I settled on was Gore Vidal’s answer to the Patriot Act, “Inventing the Nation”. It is also, interestingly, the continuing conversation between the author and John F. Kennedy (sadly one sided these days). JFK wondered how “a sort of backwoods country like this, with only three million people, could have produced the three greatest geniuses of the 18th century.” And Gore Vidal has been pondering this very question ever since.

The edition I read, was forwarded by one of my favorite politicians, Bob Carr, former Premier of NSW for 12 years. One of the few openly intellectual politicians to be elected in the sunburnt country, and who also holds a deep fascination with American History. And now thanks to this book, so do I. It is interesting how difficult it was to put this democracy together, how they were thinking of importing the Polish Monarchy, and the various acts of treason from Agent Number 7, the funding of Napoleon, to the cold war of words with France. All the elements of recent history are here. No wonder so many great movies come from America. It is amazing how even for the most remarkable of minds, they still have feet very much made of clay.

As I’m still trying to process much of the information the book possesses, I can only offer a recommendation to read it, rather then to offer an analysis of it. All I can do it to warn you that as a causal studier of American History (a nice way to say that everything I know about the subject comes from The Simpsons), it can be at times very difficult to follow. Vidal makes so many allusions to other periods in history that would require a whole library of books to verify.

So, for Gore Vidal, previously only known to me as the author of the late 1960s deconstruction novel Myra Breckinridge, where a Transsexual sets about intellectually destroying that most sacred of American Institutions, Hollywood. This book shows no signs of his mellowing with age.

Posted in Book Review | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments